Volume 7: South West England

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Gillingham 1, Dorset Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
Now set on west window sill of south aisle
Evidence for Discovery
Came to light when vicarage rebuilt in 1883, and was then inserted into the north wall of the vicarage house.
Church Dedication
St Mary the Virgin
Present Condition
Broken and damaged but face D crisp
Description

A (broad): Vestiges of a fine plant-scroll with small pointed berry bunches and one pointed and veined leaf surviving. Most of the face has been obliterated by the superimposition of a sundial measuring 26 cm (10.25 in) across, and 15.5 cm (6.25 in) high. The hole for the gnomon and five tide lines are extant.

B (narrow): This face is very worn and damaged, but what may be two pairs of simple pattern E knots joined by a central twist survive.

C (broad): Hollowed out at the back, probably for reuse as stoup? All decoration completely lost.

D (narrow): Fine median-incised irregular interlace.

E (top): Square socket hole 22 x 20 cm, depth 16 cm

Discussion

Gillingham was obviously an important Anglo-Saxon centre, probably a minster site with several dependent chapels (Hall 2000, 15, fig. 6), one of which was East Stour with which this piece has obvious stylistic parallels (Ills. 57–64). Since the opposite face (C) to that with the plant-scroll is lost, one cannot tell whether this shaft had the same formula of alternating plant-scrolls and interlace, but the style of its cascading grape bunches and the elegant median-incised interlace is very similar to East Stour, and it must be very close in date to that shaft. A similar interlace composition with sharply cut median-incised strands is also found at Hanging Langford, Wiltshire (Ill. 452). The interlace here is indeed more controlled and confident than on East Stour or Hanging Langford and one can only lament the loss of so much of the detail on this fragment.

Date
Eighth / ninth century
References
Browne 1917, 233–4, pl. facing 241; Drinkwater 1960, 82–3; Jope 1964, 102n; Newman and Pevsner 1972, 215; R.C.H.M.(E.) 1972, xxx, 30, pl. 3; Plunkett 1984, I, 216, II, 298; Hall 2000, 15
Endnotes
None

Forward button Back button
mouseover