Volume 10: The West Midlands

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Claverley 1, Shropshire Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
Set at the east end of the south aisle. There is also a twelfth-century font set further west in the south aisle.
Evidence for Discovery
The font is said to have been found in the grounds of nearby Chyknell Hall. It was returned to the church in 1902 (church guide 2005).
Church Dedication
All Saints
Present Condition
Quite good, but there is a repaired crack on the east side of the bowl.
Description

This circular tub font has three, half-round mouldings around the external face of the rim. The mouldings are 3 cm (1.2 in), 2.5 cm (1 in) and 2.5 cm (1 in) wide. Below these moulded bands the external surface bows outwards before narrowing a little to a low, integral pedestal 10 cm (3.9 in) high. The outer face is covered with fairly fine, diagonal tooling. There are two metal straps around the body of the font: one just below the rim mouldings and one around the top of the basal pedestal. The rim around the font bowl is flat and 11 cm (4.3 in) wide, while the bowl itself is straight-sided and flat bottomed. There is no drain hole.

Discussion

Appendix K item (Fonts and stoups in the Western Midlands).

It has been suggested that this could be a Saxon font (Leonard 2004, 238) although Newman and Pevsner wondered whether it might be early Norman (Newman and Pevsner 2006, 210). The presence of a fine early twelfth-century font also in the south aisle of the church might support a late Anglo-Saxon date for this plainer font if it originally came from this church. Its local find spot (Chyknell Hall is only about 1.5 km away) make this assumption likely. See also Chapter V, Further thoughts on fonts (pp. 62–4).

Date
Eleventh century
References
Leonard 2004, 238; Newman and Pevsner 2006, 210
Endnotes

[1] There are, beside the Deerhurst font in Gloucestershire which has been shown to be of ninth-century date (Deerhurst St Mary 3, p. 163, Ills. 132–44, 740), a number of fonts in the study area that have been said to be Anglo-Saxon or could be Anglo-Saxon. There are also objects like Bisley All Saints 6 (below, Ills. 732–4) that has been described as a font fragment, and Kenchester 1 (p. 382, Ills. 735–6) that now functions as a font, but that are much smaller than all of the other vessels and may, therefore, have originally been used as stoups or lavabo bowls (see below, and 'Further thoughts on fonts' in Chapter V, pp. 62–4, Table 1). In the following Appendix three vessels that were probably stoups have been listed first, followed by the fonts in chronological order by form (cylindrical tub fonts, square tub fonts, tapering or cone-shaped fonts, and bowl-shaped fonts). Some clearly belong to the Overlap period but are included because they show continuity of form and decoration into the later decades of the eleventh century and beyond.

The tub font at Deerhurst is the earliest securely datable font, and an eighth-century Anglo-Saxon ivory panel in the Victoria and Albert Museum that depicts the baptism of Christ also show a tub font (Beckwith 1972, 119, cat. 5, ill. 20). Tub fonts have, therefore, been placed first in the catalogue below. However, in the south-west of England the earliest surviving fonts are bowl-shaped (copies of domestic bowls) and it seems inherently likely that both tubs and bowls were in use at the same time (Cramp 2006, 38; Blair 2010).

Many of the western Midlands fonts seem to have been carved from newly worked stone, but several are carved into reused Roman capitals and bases. One of the reused Roman bases (at Woolstaston, Shropshire), almost certainly came from the Roman city of Viroconium (Wroxeter) but, unlike the similarly reused bases at Wroxeter St Andrew and Shrewsbury Abbey (pp. 390, 389, Ills. 762–3, 768–70), this vessel has been very crudely reshaped and the bowl is only 8 cm deep (p. 386, Ills. 756–7). It does not look like a font at all but it would, in fact, be ideal for the baptism of adults by affusion or aspersion. Adult baptism must have been very rare by the later Anglo-Saxon period, so it seems possible that the Woolstaston font might be very early, perhaps even sub-Roman.


Forward button Back button
mouseover