Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Font1
Measurements:
H. 48 cm (18.9 in); W. (external diam.) c.77 > 75 cm (30.3 > 29.5 in) at base
Font bowl: W. (internal diam.) 54 cm (21.2 in); D. (of bowl) 36 cm (14.1 in)
Stone type: Hard greyish orange to dark greyish orange (10YR 6/5) fine to medium-grained (0.2 to 0.4 mm) well sorted sandstone. Grains mainly quartz but feldspar very common along with mica. Grains of greenish chloritic material possibly after reworked volcanic material. Quartz grains are sub rounded to sub angular. There are some pink tinged patches on the surface which may be the result of the stone having been in a fire. Possibly Alveley Member, Salop Formation, Warwickshire Group of Upper Carboniferous.
Plate numbers in printed volume: Ills. 760-1
Corpus volume reference: Vol 10 p. 389
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
This circular tub font has three, half-round mouldings around the external face of the rim. The mouldings are 3 cm (1.2 in), 2.5 cm (1 in) and 2.5 cm (1 in) wide. Below these moulded bands the external surface bows outwards before narrowing a little to a low, integral pedestal 10 cm (3.9 in) high. The outer face is covered with fairly fine, diagonal tooling. There are two metal straps around the body of the font: one just below the rim mouldings and one around the top of the basal pedestal. The rim around the font bowl is flat and 11 cm (4.3 in) wide, while the bowl itself is straight-sided and flat bottomed. There is no drain hole.
Appendix K item (Fonts and stoups in the Western Midlands).
It has been suggested that this could be a Saxon font (Leonard 2004, 238) although Newman and Pevsner wondered whether it might be early Norman (Newman and Pevsner 2006, 210). The presence of a fine early twelfth-century font also in the south aisle of the church might support a late Anglo-Saxon date for this plainer font if it originally came from this church. Its local find spot (Chyknell Hall is only about 1.5 km away) make this assumption likely. See also Chapter V, Further thoughts on fonts (pp. 62–4).
[1] There are, beside the Deerhurst font in Gloucestershire which has been shown to be of ninth-century date (Deerhurst St Mary 3, p. 163, Ills. 132–44, 740), a number of fonts in the study area that have been said to be Anglo-Saxon or could be Anglo-Saxon. There are also objects like Bisley All Saints 6 (below, Ills. 732–4) that has been described as a font fragment, and Kenchester 1 (p. 382, Ills. 735–6) that now functions as a font, but that are much smaller than all of the other vessels and may, therefore, have originally been used as stoups or lavabo bowls (see below, and 'Further thoughts on fonts' in Chapter V, pp. 62–4, Table 1). In the following Appendix three vessels that were probably stoups have been listed first, followed by the fonts in chronological order by form (cylindrical tub fonts, square tub fonts, tapering or cone-shaped fonts, and bowl-shaped fonts). Some clearly belong to the Overlap period but are included because they show continuity of form and decoration into the later decades of the eleventh century and beyond.
The tub font at Deerhurst is the earliest securely datable font, and an eighth-century Anglo-Saxon ivory panel in the Victoria and Albert Museum that depicts the baptism of Christ also show a tub font (Beckwith 1972, 119, cat. 5, ill. 20). Tub fonts have, therefore, been placed first in the catalogue below. However, in the south-west of England the earliest surviving fonts are bowl-shaped (copies of domestic bowls) and it seems inherently likely that both tubs and bowls were in use at the same time (Cramp 2006, 38; Blair 2010).
Many of the western Midlands fonts seem to have been carved from newly worked stone, but several are carved into reused Roman capitals and bases. One of the reused Roman bases (at Woolstaston, Shropshire), almost certainly came from the Roman city of Viroconium (Wroxeter) but, unlike the similarly reused bases at Wroxeter St Andrew and Shrewsbury Abbey (pp. 390, 389, Ills. 762–3, 768–70), this vessel has been very crudely reshaped and the bowl is only 8 cm deep (p. 386, Ills. 756–7). It does not look like a font at all but it would, in fact, be ideal for the baptism of adults by affusion or aspersion. Adult baptism must have been very rare by the later Anglo-Saxon period, so it seems possible that the Woolstaston font might be very early, perhaps even sub-Roman.



