Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Font 1
Measurements: H. (external) 38 cm (15 in); (internal — depth of bowl) 26 cm (10.2 in); W. (external diam.) 75 by 66 cm (29.5 by 26 in); (internal) 58 by 51 cm (22.8 by 20 in)
Stone type: Pinkish grey (5YR 8/1), weakly calcareous, poorly sorted, clast-supported sandstone bedded in units 1.5 to 2.0 cm thick. The sub-angular to sub-rounded quartz grains vary from 0.2 to 2 mm across, but are mostly in the range 0.4 to 0.7 mm. Raglan Mudstone Formation? (Lower Old Red Sandstone Group, Old Red Sandstone Super Group), Upper Silurian (Pridoli) age.
Plate numbers in printed volume: Ills. 741-3
Corpus volume reference: Vol 10 p. 383-4
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
Font or stone tub. The surfaces of this straight-sided tub are undecorated and covered with vertical tooling. It is slightly oval with a wide (7–8 cm) flat rim around the central bowl. There is a central drain hole in the bottom of the bowl.
Appendix K item (Fonts and stoups in the Western Midlands).
This stone tub may be eleventh century or earlier in date and, set on the ground or on a plinth, could have functioned as a baptismal bowl/font (see also Chapter V, Further thoughts on fonts, pp. 62–4).
[1] There are, beside the Deerhurst font in Gloucestershire which has been shown to be of ninth-century date (Deerhurst St Mary 3, p. 163, Ills. 132–44, 740), a number of fonts in the study area that have been said to be Anglo-Saxon or could be Anglo-Saxon. There are also objects like Bisley All Saints 6 (below, Ills. 732–4) that has been described as a font fragment, and Kenchester 1 (p. 382, Ills. 735–6) that now functions as a font, but that are much smaller than all of the other vessels and may, therefore, have originally been used as stoups or lavabo bowls (see below, and 'Further thoughts on fonts' in Chapter V, pp. 62–4, Table 1). In the following Appendix three vessels that were probably stoups have been listed first, followed by the fonts in chronological order by form (cylindrical tub fonts, square tub fonts, tapering or cone-shaped fonts, and bowl-shaped fonts). Some clearly belong to the Overlap period but are included because they show continuity of form and decoration into the later decades of the eleventh century and beyond.
The tub font at Deerhurst is the earliest securely datable font, and an eighth-century Anglo-Saxon ivory panel in the Victoria and Albert Museum that depicts the baptism of Christ also show a tub font (Beckwith 1972, 119, cat. 5, ill. 20). Tub fonts have, therefore, been placed first in the catalogue below. However, in the south-west of England the earliest surviving fonts are bowl-shaped (copies of domestic bowls) and it seems inherently likely that both tubs and bowls were in use at the same time (Cramp 2006, 38; Blair 2010).
Many of the western Midlands fonts seem to have been carved from newly worked stone, but several are carved into reused Roman capitals and bases. One of the reused Roman bases (at Woolstaston, Shropshire), almost certainly came from the Roman city of Viroconium (Wroxeter) but, unlike the similarly reused bases at Wroxeter St Andrew and Shrewsbury Abbey (pp. 390, 389, Ills. 762–3, 768–70), this vessel has been very crudely reshaped and the bowl is only 8 cm deep (p. 386, Ills. 756–7). It does not look like a font at all but it would, in fact, be ideal for the baptism of adults by affusion or aspersion. Adult baptism must have been very rare by the later Anglo-Saxon period, so it seems possible that the Woolstaston font might be very early, perhaps even sub-Roman.



