Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Cross-shaft fragment
Measurements: H. 20 cm (7.8 in); W. 31 cm (12.1 in); D. 24.8 cm (9.7 in)
Stone type: Fine-grained, oolitic limestone
Plate numbers in printed volume:
Corpus volume reference: Vol 10 p. 276-7
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
Fragment of a cross-shaft with a broad, slightly rounded edge moulding and surviving carving on two adjoining faces.
A (broad): The carved surface is badly damaged and difficult to interpret, but the face appears to be divided into two panels by a median-incised horizontal border. A broad plant stem sweeps up across the horizontal border, widening as it rises before passing under a second plant stem that splits into two near the edge moulding on the left. To the right, another pair of plant stems twist across each other before passing over and under the dividing border. At the intersection of the stems and the border there is what might be a pendant berry bunch.
B, C and E: Missing
D (narrow): A tangle of large, interlacing plant stems spreads across this face. The design is organic in form rather than geometric. Near the centre is a downward-pointing, elliptical leaf with an elongated, slightly curving tip. There is a 'V'-shaped junction between the base of this leaf and the stem from which it grows. Part of what might be a second, smaller leaf survives in the top left corner.
F (bottom): This face of the stone has been partly re-dressed with coarse, horizontal tooling to form a smooth bedding plane, probably for reuse. It is possible that this was the original bottom face of the stone, and, if so, it would indicate that the shaft was formed from more than one block.
The rather heavy interlacing plant-scroll on face D is similar to tenth-century examples from Devon (Braunton 1) and Somerset (Wells 1) (Cramp 2006, 79–80, 176, ills. 1, 324, 327). Within the study area the tenth century shaft at Kinwarton in Warwickshire offers similar large-scale interlace (p. 339, Ills. 592–6), while the tight loop in the lower right corner of face D is very like the repeated loops on the tenth-century string course fragment Bisley All Saints 4 (p. 143, Ill. 53). If there is a berry bunch on face A as suggested above, then this feature combined with rather tangled interlace might be compared to the tenth-century fragment Worcester Cathedral 2 (p. 368, Ills. 672, 674, 676). The Lawrence Weston carving is a valuable addition to the Corpus from the southern part of Gloucestershire, and should probably be dated to the tenth century like the examples above.
A chapel at Lawrence Weston is first recorded in 1274; it disappeared in the sixteenth century and its exact site is unknown (Orme and Cannon 2010, 41–3, 105).



