Volume 7: South West England

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Nunney 1, Somerset Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
Formerly on north sill in the chancel; stolen from the church in 2003
Evidence for Discovery
Dug up in churchyard (Dobson 1931, 188)
Church Dedication
All Saints
Present Condition
Damaged and very worn
Description

A: A flat-band moulding survives on three sides, enclosing a plant-scroll with sharply angled tendrils in which the strands are median-incised, one fastened with a domed clip. The leaves in the volutes are long and curling with lobed tips, and deeply incised, as is the bud which separates the upper volutes.

B: Two affronted birds, their heads craning backwards to grasp at their feet.

C: Cut away

D: Part of a plant-scroll with crumpled leaves, buds, and a flat-band moulding on one side to which the scroll is clipped. There is a bird with back-turned head at the upper end.

Discussion

The foliage type here is a poor relation to Maperton, Colyton and Todber (Ills. 304, 3–4, 106–13), but many of the characteristics survive, such as the long curling leaves with lobed tips, the domed 'clips', and possibly the birds (see introduction p. 51). Plunkett (1984, I, 210) notes that the paired birds with craning necks are'a recognisable C10th form, comparable for instance to those on the Thames censer, that from Canterbury, or on a cruet from London (Wilson 1964, nos. 44, 9, and 147)'. He also notes that the type is long lasting since craning birds are also found on the Fuller brooch (Wilson 1964, no. 153). These however are flatter and more mannered and have probably been influenced by the simpler types of interlaced reptiles so common in Wessex (see introduction p. 42).

Date
Late tenth century
References
Cottrill 1931, appendix; Dobson 1931, 188; Eeles 1932b, xviii; Kendrick 1949, 40; Pevsner 1958b, 20, 238; Jope 1964, 94n, 105; Dunning 1976, 5; McGarvie 1980, 22; Hill 1982, fig. 11.3; Foster 1984, 89–90. no. 56, pl. 3; Plunkett 1984, I, 203, 206, 207, 210, 224, II, 304, 367, pl. 87; Foster 1987, 58, 60, 77, no. 50, fig. 8; Costen 1992a, 156
Endnotes
None

Forward button Back button
mouseover