Volume 6: Northern Yorkshire

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Brompton in Allertonshire 16, Yorkshire North Riding Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
At the east end of the north aisle of the church
Evidence for Discovery
See Brompton In Allertonshire 1 (St Thomas)
Church Dedication
St Thomas
Present Condition
A hogback with most of one end-beast missing; worn, but some tooling still apparent
Description

The decoration is identical on each side.

A (long) : A plain, flat ridge issues from the end-beast's jowl. Below it is a strip of pellets flanked by two plain mouldings, following the curve of the roof. Below is a broad panel of closed circuit twist in flat strand, threaded by a free strand with arrow-head terminals at each end that fill the spandrels of the shallow arch of a recessed niche. This niche is flat-topped and edged with a flat moulding. Within the niche the surface retains rough chisel marks.

The end-beast is fairly naturalistic and muzzled. The jowl has an abrupt snout, incised circular eyes on top, along with pointed ears in plain moulding. The forelegs have distinct elbows and the paws four toes touching the ridge. Only the paws of the lost end-beast survive.

C (long) : As face A.

Discussion

This is a type d (extended niche) hogback, but it is distinguished from other examples at Brompton and Sockburn by its more substantial end-beasts and the unique free strand in the interlace with arrow-head terminals. It is possible that the latter were intended as zoomorphic heads which might be compared with Hovingham 1 (Lang 1991, 144–5, ill. 486–9), but similar arrow-head terminals have recently been recognised on the Cranwell 2 hogback in Lincolnshire (Everson and Stocker 1999, 138). The pellet strip is also a unique feature on a hogback. This stone may be a transition from type c.

Date
First half of tenth century
References
Rowe 1877, 62; Collingwood 1907, 276, 286, 293, 300, fig. c on 298; Collingwood 1912, 116, 123, fig. c; Page, W. 1914, 431; Collingwood 1927a, 168, fig. 205c; Elgee and Elgee 1933, 220, fig. 40; Lang 1967, 27–30, figs. 4, 5, pl. II; Lang 1984a, 99, 118, no. 1, pl. on 119
Endnotes

[1]The following are general references to the Brompton stones: (—) 1867–8, lxxxviii; Rowe 1870, 240; (—) 1871–2, xxiv; Greenwell 1869–79a, lx; Rowe 1877, 61–4; Allen and Browne 1885, 352; Browne 1885–6, 124, 128; Saywell 1886, 481; Allen 1887, 126, 386, fig. 28; (—) 1890–5a, viii; Haverfield and Greenwell 1899, 125–6; Bulmer 1890, 389; Hodges 1894, 195; Morris, J. 1904, 32, 84–5, 420; Bogg 1908, 28–32, ills. on 29 and 32; Page, W. 1914, 430, 431; Morris, J. 1931, 33, 86, 87, 417; Elgee and Elgee 1933, 219–20, 245; Mee 1941, 41–2; Fisher 1959, 89; Pevsner 1966, 90, pl. 8; Bailey 1980, 85, 100, 240, 252, 255, 265; Kerr and Kerr 1982, 38–9 and ill.; Morris, R. 1983, 7; Cramp 1984, 11, 30, 93; Bailey and Cramp 1988, 54; Lang 1988a, 14, 24, 56; Cambridge 1989, 378; Richards 1991, 80, 119, 124, ill. 81; Everson and Stocker 1999, 138; Stocker 2000, 205–6.
[2] The following are general references to the Brompton hogbacks (in addition to the note on p. 65): Walker 1884–5, 420; Allen 1889, 230


Forward button Back button
mouseover